All but one of the items fitted with the three-parameter logistic model had nonzero c parameters. Item 4 was fitted with 3PL because of the nature of the item even though it is an open-ended item; however, the c parameter was estimated to be 0.
When the nominal model, with 40 free parameters, was fitted it converged in 46 iterations and yielded a marginal reliability of. The estimated parameters for Mathematics are given in Table 2M. An a priori ordering of categories was not required for the nominal model. A posteriori, the nonresponse category scaled lower than the incorrect category in each item in both subjects. This is consistent with Swinton's results.
For each subject, the item-by-item ratings were summed across items and averaged across raters at each achievement level. These numbers are listed in column three of Table 3.
Using the TSF obtained from each model, the ratings were mapped to the 0 scale. The cutpoints on the 0 scale are in column four for the logistic model, and column five for the nominal model in Table 3. Notice that in each case except in Mathematics at the Basic level the cutpoints were higher when the nominal model was used.
Notice that in each case, the expected score based on the logistic model was generally higher than the expected score based on the nominal model especially at the upper part of the 0-scale. In this study, the ICC was usually higher than the correct response curve from the nominal model. It was observed, however, that for items with very high nonresponse rates the correct response curves converged together at high values of EL An example of this is item number nine in Reading as seen in Figure 6.
Instead of comparing the cutpoints per se, a common way of comparing cutpoints is by comparing the percents of students scoring at-or-above each cutpoint. This information is provided in columns five and seven of Table 3 These percentages are of students in the data set who scored at or above each cutpoint. In both Reading and Mathematics none of the students scored at the Advanced level using the nominal model.
There were more students scoring at or above the cutpoints set using the logistic model, with the exception of the Basic level in Reading. The differences in the percentages were very small at the Basic level for each subject. The values were 1. The largest difference in Reading was at the Proficient level The differences in percents at or above were not as large in Mathematics as they were in Reading.
The largest difference in Mathematics was also at the proficient level, but it was only 5. Significance of the Study: A number of studies have been done regarding student test-taking behavior, and even more have been done on different item types. In , Swinton discussed students' test-taking strategies when there is a combination of different item types in a test. The results presented here are preliminary. References: Bock, R. Estimating item parameters and latent ability when responses are scored in two or more nominal categories.
Psychometrika, 37, Samejima, F. Estimation of latent ability using response pattern of graded scores Psychometric Monograph No. Swinton, S. April, Scoring with nominal missing-response parameters. Nonresponse to NAEP items of different formats as a function of ability, age, gender, and ethnicity.
Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Thissen, D. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software. This level represents solid academic performance for each grade assessed. Students reaching this level have demonstrated competency over challenging subject matter, including subject-matter knowledge, application of such knowledge to real world situations, and analytical skills appropriate to the subject matter. This level denotes partial mastery of prerequisite knowledge and skills that are fundamental for proficient work at each grade.
This level signifies superior performance beyond proficient. Readers, for example, bring to the process their prior knowledge about the topic, their reasons for reading it, their individual reading skills and strategies, and their understanding of differences in text structures. The texts used in the reading assessment are representative of common real world reading demands. Students at Grade 4 are asked to respond-to literary and informational texts which differ in structure, organization, and features.
Literary texts include short stories, poems, and plays that engage the reader in a variety of ways, not the least of which is reading for fun.
Informational texts include selections from textbooks, magazines, encyclopedias, and other written sources whose purpose is to increase the reader's knowledge.
In addition to literary and informational texts, students at Grades 8 and 12 are asked to respond to practical texts e. The context of the reading situation includes the purposes for reading that the reader might use in building a meaning of the text. For example, in reading for literary experience, students may want to see how the author explores or uncovers experiences, or they may be looking for vicarious experience through the story's characters. On the other hand, the student's purpose in reading informational texts may be to learn about a topic such as the Civil War or the oceans or to accomplish a task such as getting somewhere, completing a form, or building something.
This includes summaries, main points, or themes. Developing InterpretationStudents are asked to extend the ideas in the text by making inferences and connections. This includes making connections between cause and effect, analyzing the motives of characters, and drawing conclusions. Personal ResponseStudents are asked to make explicit connections between the ideas in the text and their own background knowledge and experiences.
This includes comparing story characters with themselves or people they know, for example, or indicating whether they found a passage useful or interesting. Critical StanceStudents are asked to consider how the author crafted a text.
This includes identifying stylistic devices such as mood and tone. These stances are not considered hierarchical or completely independent of each other. Rather, they provide a frame for generating questions and considering student performance at all levels. All students at all levels should be able to respond to reading selections from all of these orientations. What varies with students' developmental and achievement levels is the amount of prompting or support needed for response, the complexity of the texts to which they can respond, and the sophistication of their answers.
They provide some specific examples of reading behaviors that should be familiar to most readers of this document. The specific examples are not inclusive; their purpose is to help clarify and differentiate what readers performing at each achievement level should be able to do.
While a number of other reading achievement indicators exist at every level, space and efficiency preclude an exhaustive listing. It should also be noted that the achievement levels are cumulative from Basic to Proficient to Advanced. One level builds on the previous levels such that knowledge at the Proficient level presumes mastery of the Basic level, and knowledge at the Advanced level presumes mastery at both the Basic and Proficient.
When reading texts appropriate for 4th graders, they should be able to make relatively obvious connections between the text and their own experiences. For example, when reading literarrtext, they should be. When reading informational text, basic-level 4th graders should be able to tell what the selection is generally about or identify the purpose for reading it; provide details to support their understanding; and connect ideas from the text to their background knowledge and experiences.
Proficient Fourth grade students performing at the proficient level should be able to demonstrate an overall understanding of the text, providing Inferential as well as literal information. When reading text appropriate to 4th grade, they should be able to extend the ideas in the text by making inferences, drawing conclusions, and making connections to their own experiences.
The connection between the text and what the student infers should be clear. For example, when reading literary text, proficient-level 4th graders should be able to summarize the story, draw conclusions about the characters or plot, and recognize relationships such as cause and effect. When reading informational text, proficient-level students should be able to summarize the information and identify the author's intent or purpose.
They should be able to draw reasonable conclusions from the text, recognize relationships such as cause and effect or similarities and differences, and identify the meaning of the selection's key concepts.
Advanced Fourth grade students performing at the advanced level should be able to generalize about topics in the reading selection and demonstrate an awareness of how authors compose and use literary devices.
When reading text appropriate to 4th grade, they should be able to judge texts critically and, in general, give thorough answers that indicate careful thought For example, when reading literary text, advanced-level staidents should be able to make generalizations about the point of the story and extend its meaning by integrating personal experiences and other readings with the Ideas suggested by the text.
They should be able to identify iiterary devices such as figurative language. When reading informational text, advanced-level 4th graders should be able to explain the author's intent by using supporting material from the text.
They should be able to make critical judgments of the form and content of the text and explain their judgments clearly. When reading text appropriate to 8th grade, they should be able to identify specific aspects of the text that reflect the overall meaning, recognize and relate Interpretations and connections among ideas in the text to personal experience, and draw conclusions based on the text. For example, when reading literary text, bast level 8th graders should be able to identify themes and make Inferences and logical predictions about aspects such as plot and characters.
When reading Informative text, they should be able to, iderttllythe main Idea and the author's purpose. They should make Inferences and draw conclusions supported by information in the text. They should recognize the relationships among the facts, Ideas; events, and concepts of the text e.
Proficient Eighth grade students performing at the proficient level should be able to show an overall understanding of the text, Including inferential as well as literal Information. When reading text appropriate to 8th grade, they should extend the ideas In the text by making clear inferences from It, by drawing conclusions, and by making connections to their own experlencesincluding other reading experiences. Proficient 8th graders should be able to identify some of the devices authors use In composing text.
They should be able to use implied as well as explicit Information in articulating themes; to Interpret the actions, behaviors, and motives of characters; and to identify the use of literary devices such as personification and foreshadowing. When reading informative text, they should be able to summarize the text using explicit and implied information and support conclusions with inferences based on the text.
When reading practical text,proficient -level students should be able to describe Its purpose and support their views with examples and details. They should be able to judge the Importance of certain steps and procedures.
Advanced Eighth grade students performing at the advanced level should be able to describe the more abstract themes and Ideas of the overall text. When reading text appropriate to 8th grade, they should be able to analyze both meaning and form and support their analyses explicitly with examples from the text; they should be able to, extend text information by relating it to their experiences and to world events.
At' this level, student responses should be thorough, thoughtful, and extensive. For example, when reading literary text, advanced-level 8th graders should be able to make complex, abstract summaries and theme statements.
They should be able to describe the interactions of various literary elements I. They should be able critically to analyze and evaluate the composition of the text. When reading informative text, they should be able to analyze the author's purpose and point of view. They should be able to use cultural and historical background information to develop perspectives on the text and be able to apply text Information to broad Issues and world situations.
When reading practical text, advanced-level students should be able to synthesize information that will guide their performance, apply text Information to new situations, and critique the usefulness of the form and content.
When reading text appropriate to 12th grade, they should be able to identity and relate aspects of the text to its overall meaning, recognize interpretations, make connections among and relate Ideas In the text to their personal experiences, and draw conclusions. They should be able to identify elements of an author's style. For example, when reading literary text, 12th-grade students should be able to explain the theme, support their conclusions with information from the text, and make connections between aspects of the text and their own experiences.
When reading informational text, basic-level 12th graders should be able to explain the main idea or purpose of a selection and use text information to support make a point. They should be able to make logical connections between the ideasa conclusion or in the text and their own background knowledge. When reading practical text, they should be able to explain Its purpose and the significance of specific details or steps. Proficient Twelfth grade students performing at the proficient level should be able to show an overall understanding of the text which includes Inferential as well as literal information.
When reading text appropriate to 12th grade, they should be able to extend the Ideas of the text by making Inferences, drawing conclusions, and making connections to their own personal experiences and other readings. Connections between inferences and the text should be clear, even when implicit. These students should be able to analyze the authors use of literary devices. When reading literary text, proficient- level 12th graders should be able to integrate their personal experiences with ideas in the text to draw and support conclusions.
They should be able to explain the author's as Irony or symbolism. When reading informative text, they should be able use ofjltarary,devices such to apply text information appropriately to specific situations and integrate their background Information with Ideas in the text to draw and support conclusions. When reading practical texts, they should be able to apply information or directions appropriately. They should be able to use personal experiences to evaluate the usefulness of text Information.
Advanced Twelfth grade students performing at the advanced levet should be able to describe MOTO abstract themes and Ideas In the overall text. When reading text appropriate to 12th grade, able to analyze both the meaning and the form of the text and explicitly they should be support their analyses with specific examples from the text. They should be able to extend the information relating It to their experiences and to the world. Their responses should be thorough, from the text by thoughtful, and extensive.
For example, when reading literary text, advanced-level 12th graders should be able to produce complex, abstract summaries and theme statements. They should be able to use cultural, historical, and personal inforMation to develop and explain text perspectives should be able to evaluate the text, applying knowledge gained from and conclusions.
They other texts. When reading informational text, they should be able to analyze, synthesize, and should be able to identify the relationship between the author's stanceevaluate paints of view. They and elements of the text. They should be able to apply text Information to new situations and to the responses to problems or Issues. When reading practical text, advanced-level process of forming new be able to make a critical evaluation of the usefulness of the text and 12th graders should to new situations.
At the fourth-grade level, algebra and functions are treated in informal and exploratory ways, often through the study of patterns. After the first item is selected, the future items will be selected according to the answers given by the individual. Item selection methods that can be used in item selection during the CAT process are given below. Maximum expected posterior weighted-information MEPWI In this method, which is similar to the MEI method, the information function is not separately calculated according to the possible answers of the individual to the item, but instead the entire possible answer of the individual is included in the function and the item providing the most information about the individual is selected from the item pool Van der Linden, Boyd, Dodd, and Choi stated that this method is not economical and increases the computational burden especially when the number of items increases.
Boyd et al. The ML method does not work when the individual responds incorrectly or correctly to the whole of the items. Van der Linden and Pashley have proposed four different solutions for this situation. The first one is to set the ability estimation to small for wrong answers or big for correct answers values until the ML method produces a valid result.
The second recommendation is that the ability estimate is held until a larger set of items is answered. The third recommendation is the use of Bayesian methods, and the fourth recommendation is to take into account the information already obtained from the individual at the beginning of the test. Stopping rules are used to decide when to end the test by computer. Reaching the maximum test length: The maximum number of items an individual can take can be determined in advance. This causes the standard error of the measurement to decrease as it increases the precision of the measurement.
The test stops when the measurement reaches enough precision. Typical standard error values used are. No item to provide more information about the individual: The test is stopped if there is no item in the item pool that will give more information about the individual. If the individual shows inappropriate behaviors to the test: In the CAT application, it can be determined that the individual gives indifferent responses, has a certain response pattern, or responds to the items very quickly, and the test can be stopped.
If a certain amount of time has elapsed: The test taker may wish to restrict the duration of test. In such a case, the test may be stopped after a certain period of time has elapsed since the start of the test. Also, although not a stopping rule, the application of all items to the test taker, usually in small item pools, can also cause the test to stop. However, a CAT application cannot be stopped without the following conditions: 1. Without applying a specific number of items: In most cases, individuals who take the test do not believe that their abilities are measured correctly without responding to items.
It is also very difficult to achieve the standard error of the measurement criteria with a very small number of items. Without full coverage: A test usually involves a number of subjects. The person who took the test before the test was stopped must have responded to all the subject areas. This is also necessary to ensure that the content validity. In order for the standard error to fall below the specified value, the individual has to respond more amount of item.
This, in turn, can affect the usefulness which is one of the most important advantages of CAT applications. Another disadvantage is that this stopping rule terminates the test despite the presence of informational items about the individual in the item pool Gardner et al.
If the test is terminated when there is no item in the item pool that will give sufficient information about the individual, the test may not have performed a measurement with sufficient precision. In this method, if a new item is applied, it is estimated how much reduction will occur in the standard error, and if the decrease amount is below a predetermined value, the test is stopped. It is developed especially for small item pools and situations where it is important to reduce the number of applied-items.
For this reason, when it is desired to develop the CAT application, it is necessary to decide which IRT model is suitable for the measurement tool planned to be applied as CAT, which ability estimation method and item selection method should be used and which stopping rule should be adopted. CAT Software Before developing the CAT application, the test developer may apply simulation studies to determine the item selection and ability estimation methods and stopping rules to be used in practice.
For this reason, below are software that can be used for simulation studies first, followed by software that can be used for live CAT application. SimulCAT offers ease of use to work with dichotomous items, while Firestar is very useful for polytomous items. Firestar, developed by Choi, produces an R syntax for various scored items depending on various parameters. In other words, the software itself does not perform the simulation operation, but produce the syntax that is required for the simulation to be done with R.
In addition, users can specify how to select the first item. D, the scaling factor can be set to 1. Information about commercial software can be accessed from the web pages of the software.
Concerto, open source software, is a software developed by the Center for Psychometrics at the University of Cambridge, based on R. Concerto operates in the web environment and forms a framework for the user for CAT applications.
The software basically records the R outputs to the MySQL database and then calls the information stored in the database to show the user as a web-based content.
Concerto has a test module, an HTML template module, and a table module. In the test module, the users can develop the CAT algorithm with the help of the catR package on the R. In the HTML module, the pages that the test taker receives are designed and in the table module, the databases are created in which the responses generated by the users and the outputs generated by R are recorded.
Int J Res Educ Sci Concerto shows the R output to the user through the database; If the user receives the input, it also transmits it to the R via the database and continues the operation of the test. Especially in 4. Conclusion In this article computerized adaptive test CAT applications are introduced and the IRT models which can be used especially in the studies in which affective traits are measured is explained.
Using these software, models, and methods, researchers can work with polytomous items eg, Likert-type or partial credit items. Rasch-model-based PCM can be used by researchers who want to include only the location parameter in the model. MFI being the most commonly used item selection method but when researchers work with large item pool, they may prefer the item selection method that is most appropriate by comparing methods with simulation studies. Researchers who want to work with post-hoc CAT simulations or live CAT applications may prefer Firestar and Concerto software because of their ease of use, their functionality and their open source code.
When all these models, methods and CAT software are considered, it is inevitable that CAT applications with polytomous items will become widespread in the future. Acknowledgements This study was derived from a part of the doctoral thesis prepared by Eren Can Aybek under the advisory of Prof.
References Aybek, E. An investigation of applicability of the Self-assessment Inventory as a computerized adaptive test CAT. Unpublished PhD thesis. Ankara University, Turkey. Aybek, E. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 7 2 , , doi: Termination criteria in computerized adaptive tests: Do variable - length CATs provide efficient and effective measurement?
Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing, 1 1 , 1— Computer-based testing and the Internet. Issues and advantages. England: John Wiley and Sons. Baker, J. A comparison of graded response and rasch partial credit models with subjective well-being. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 25, — Bock, R. Estimating item parameters and latent ability when responses are scored in two or more nominal categories.
Psychometrika, 37 1 , Boyd, A. Polytomous models in computerized adaptive testing. Nering, M. Handbook of polytomous item response theory models. New York: Routledge. Chang, H. A global information approach to computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 20 3 , Cheng, Y.
Computerized adaptive testing — New developments and applications. Illionis University, Illionis. Comparison of CAT item selection criteria for polytomous items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33 6 , — Firestar: Computerized adaptive testing simulation program for polytomous item response theory models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33 8 , — A new stopping rule for computerized adaptive testing. Educational Psycholofical Measurement, 70 6 , 1— A guide to computer adaptive testing systems.
Council of Chief State School Officers. De Ayala, R. The theory and practice of item response theory. New York:The Guilford Press. DeMars, C. Item response theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. The development of IRT based attitude scale towards educational measurement course. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 7 1 , , doi: Dodd, B. Computerized adaptive testing with polytomous items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19 1 , 5— Handbook of test development.
New Jersey: Lawrance Erlbaum Assoc. Embretson, S. Item response theory for psychologists. New Jersey: Lawrance Erlbaum Associaties. Fox, J. Bayesian Item Response Modeling. New York: Springer. Gardner, W. Computerized adaptive measurement of depression: A simulation study. BMC Psychiatry, 4 1. Haley, S. Replenishing a computerized adaptive test of patient-reported daily activity functioning.
Quality of Life Research, 18 4 , Fundementals of item response theory. Newbury Park: Sage Pub. Hambleton, R. Fundementals of Item Response Theory. California: Sage Pub. CAT software. Computer-adaptive testing: A methodology whose time has come. Chae, S. Linden, W. Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice. New York: Kluver Academic Pub. Handbook of modern item response theory.
Lord, F. Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems.
0コメント