Techline software sizing

More details on the exact breakdown for workloads can be found later in this document. There are really two distinct dimensions to the test environment sizing: number of assets and the number and roles of users actively interacting with those assets.

As your user community grows in size, number of hosted projects, and length of time using the CLM platform, the supporting hardware resources need to grow too in order to support your expanding user community. By testing this extreme workload size on a very large asset base, we will show you how well the CLM platform scales. Note that the users sizing relates to the actual number of active users, which is a small fraction of the total number of registered users.

Two primary reference configurations were tested for scalability: the single application server and the distributed application server environments.

Below are block diagrams of the two configurations. Each configuration was tested with different user loads. The block diagrams are followed by tables of test results complete with hardware specifications, utilization and response time numbers. These results can be used as a starting point for scalability expectations of these products or the entire CLM solution.

If further scalability advice is needed, have your IBM sales team contact the Techline to give specific advice based on your workload and hardware constraints. Using the described workload above, the tables below were compiled based on the various hardware and software configurations tested. When considering sizing options, CLM supports several multi-tier configurations depending on your deployment size.

With our test environment and at least two servers running on one of the latest state-of-the-art x64 hardware chipsets e. Xeon or better , we demonstrated the ability to handle enterprise load on a single server for the applications and one for the database server configuration. Here are the current sizing recommendations for different enterprise deployments.

These recommendations will be refined as more complete performance testing is done and the Techline hardware scaling model is available. Currently we have no recommendations for bit servers for a distributed topology as we have at present only tested performance on bit servers.

This information will also be provided in a future version of this document. While the Jazz Server is pre-configured with Tomcat out of the box, which is good for evaluation and smaller departmental deployments, we rather recommend using WebSphere Application Server WAS for large-scale and enterprise deployments. The SSO experience is limited to one host i. There are external SSO solutions available, but we have not yet confirmed these were supported by Jazz deployments in Tomcat.

WebSphere Application Server WAS does provide flexibility for creating multiple profiles, has built-in configurable reverse proxy , and provides full support for Single Sign-On SSO whether the applications are all-in one server, or distributed amongst multiple machines for better scalability; WAS also offers out of the box an administration user interface for installing; stopping and re starting applications, configuring Java virtual machine properties, security, etc.

Customers have told us that they are taking advantage of the ability to create instantaneous WAS instances to enable deployment of a new Jazz server which utilizes their existing security configuration.

The idle standby failover setup procedures are only documented for WAS. There are two aspects to network connectivity: connectivity amongst the Jazz application and database servers within the CLM environment and connectivity between the CLM servers and the end users. The recommendation for network connectivity in dual-tier configurations of the CLM environment is to minimize latency between the application server and database server no more than 1 — 2 ms and to have the servers located on the same subnet.

When using external storage solutions, the recommendation is to minimize connectivity latencies, with the optimal configuration being via Fibre optical. As far as network connectivity with the end users of the CLM platform, there are conditions of slow WAN performance and high volume build or SCM usage that can be vastly improved by implementing a content caching proxy server scheme. This configuration is described in the content caching proxy server article on jazz.

There are several considerations when choosing disk subsystems including continuing availability in the event of a disk crash, preventing repository data loss, and raw throughput and low latency of disk operations.

In our small and medium sized configurations for the CLM testing, we chose a RAID 1E mirrored disk configuration providing complete data redundancy and continued operation in the event of a single disk failure. This configuration is not cost prohibitive for customers without large SAN or NAS solutions available but still provides reasonable operational characteristics.

For larger configuration, use of a NAS solution with direct fibre channel connectivity is recommended but not required. As background, during our original user scalability runs for RTC 2. We knew that this single drive configuration was clearly a bottleneck but needed to collect data to prove it. During our RTC 3. It was clear that we needed a more scalable enterprise storage solution as the single drive and controller had no idle time.

We also knew that our customers would appreciate the fact that we certify and directly support this solution. In our RTC 3. With the storage directly connected via a Fibre Channel FC connection there is no latency between the storage and the server, even if the devices are located on separate floors. Alternative enterprise storage solutions do have real-time monitoring, hot swap drive replacement support as well as failover in real-time with zero downtime. As suggested by the tested topologies, each application server is connected to a Jazz Team Server which provides central administration and other common services for the registered applications.

Verdict: CAD Pro Furniture Design software is a great tool for Windows users to help create interiors and wood furniture in particular. It includes some tools typically available in free architectural design software , ruler readings and parameters, automatic shaping instruments, various types of wood and fittings. Many users like the ability to export and share their designs via email or social media directly as the original file is saved in PDF format.

Besides, you can create sketches, scan and download designs, and continue working in this free woodworking CAD software. Verdict: SweetHome 3D is a professional, cross-platform software for furniture design. It allows you to create a home plan and choose furniture placement. You can make a custom design that matches your floor plan. It is the best free furniture design software thanks to the unique ability to use third-party plug-ins as well as ready-made furniture types in PDF formats. Once you download the finished furniture or create it from scratch, you can change the colors, size, thickness and texture.

You can also add windows and doors. It is worth mentioning that you can use this software both online and downloaded to your PC. Verdict: SmartDraw is ideal for both beginners and professional furniture designers.

This software for designing furniture will help you create custom shapes and designs for shelves, drawers, racks, etc. You can start with 12 cabinet templates and then integrate several hundred visual elements.

This free cabinet design software has templates, examples and symbols to create the perfect commercial kitchen space. You can position burners, coolers and more. Verdict: SketchList is used as an automatic tool for creating 3D plans for kitchens, cabinetry and any other furniture. All you have to do is enter the dimensions and parameters of the wood material to get the automatically generated reports.

Plus, SketchList 3D woodworking design software lets you add seams and contours with a single click. You can use the default colors and textures when designing furniture or create your own. Solid 3D sketches allow you to mark even the smallest details and quickly modify them if something looks wrong.

Manual Flush Valve Maximum recommended system pressure without clamps : 50 psi Acceptable hose sizes for 12mm: 0. Reducing Coupling Maximum recommended system pressure without clamps : 50 psi Acceptable hose sizes for 12mm: 0.

Operation Flag Down flag position closed : 4. Drip Tube 6 in. Spacing ft. Combination Tee Maximum recommended system pressure without clamps : 50 psi Acceptable hose sizes for 12mm: 0. Netafim - Cross Fitting 12mm Barbed fittings for secure fit and easy installation Withstands heat, direct sun, and harsh chemicals One piece const Coil 18 in.

Drip Tube 12 in. Blank Tubing ' Coil Length Techline DL dripline provides maximum uniformity for both subsurface and on-surface installations. The pressure com Our online store has one of the largest warehouse selections of Netafim Drip Tubing for residential and commercial lawns and landscape irrigation systems. Drip Tubing Dripperline from Netafim Netafim's dripperline Techline provides water directly to the roots of the vegetation and plants helping in the event of a drought.

Zones that have Netafim drip tubing are often used as just one part of a complete sprinkler system, consisting of various plumbing parts, piping and automatic irrigation control equipment. Find a large selection from Techline drip and Techline CV 17mm tubing, 12mm tubing and more.

Water flows through the Netafim tubing and enters the dripper through filters in the drip inlet. The tubing filter blocks dirt and debris from entering the emitter, ensuring only clean water enters the dripperline. Netafim TechLine 17mm Fittings.